Loading…
I have their old fantom cross bike which has very similar geometry (go figure). It’s a fun bike, not too stable, not too twitchy (some super stable bikes have to be a little manhandled to get them to turn.
My biggest gripes with it are: Its aluminum (not a problem for your bike), and the head tube is too low at 115 (not a problem on your bike). So I wouldn’t change anything. I like a little higher bottom bracket because I hate pedal strike (and I corner aggressively). I don’t find a disadvantage to a high one, but hate a low BB. The head tube only looks ~10mm lower than a Roker, Warbird, or Open U.P.
This bike looks good for racing – should have decent power transfer and ability to dodge obstacles at speed. Obviously its not super slack or low or tall if that is what you desire in a bike.
Now, I'm pretty new to all of this, but I'm thinking this is a CX bike being sold as a gravel bike. Even the text descriptions throughout keeps falling back to calling it a cross bike. Take a look at the geo chart for Motobecane's full-on CX Whipshot geometry. The numbers are the same. Just throw on the new Shimano "gravel" group, and call it a gravel bike?
The biggest difference is the wheelbase, short compared to current gravel bikes. What about tire sizing? How big would you like to go? You could certainly "dominate" with the 40c tires, or down as small as 25 for maximum speed (again, with those numbers thrown about, seems to be a CX bike). Not sure what kind of gravel you have, or where your rides take you now, or possibly in the future, but i sure would like to know i could run 650b x 2.1 in the future.
I'm guessing here, and correct me if I'm wrong, but this not may be the most ideal bike for "100+ mile training rides and races."
eric/fresno, ca.
epzamora wrote:Not sure what kind of gravel you have, or where your rides take you now, or possibly in the future, but i sure would like to know i could run 650b x 2.1 in the future.I'm guessing here, and correct me if I'm wrong, but this not may be the most ideal bike for "100+ mile training rides and races."
eric/fresno, ca.
zen_ wrote:
I gave it quite a bit of thought, and ended up getting a Tamland 1 instead that I'll upgrade.
epzamora wrote:
Those Tamlands get nice reviews. What do you see upgrading first?
eric/fresno, ca.
Sign in to reply — or claim your old account if you posted here before.