Loading…
simplemind wrote:Thanks for the writeup! How does it do on washboard? I have more of an issue with that, than anything else and I would consider a Lauf fork, however I've read that it doesn't handle washboard too well.
chas wrote:I own Canyon VCLS, Specialized CG-R, and Thudbuster (ST). I can't imagine doing long gravel without something to take the harshness out of the bumps. Body Float looks like a top shelf offering.
bobknh wrote:
Good question. The Kinekt isn't a suspension, in that it does nothing to help the wheels stay in contact with the ground. While it does absorb the impact of washboard on your backside, it does nothing to help your bike's handling on washboard, and the concussive impact on your hands, arms, and upper body. What I notice when I hit some washboard on high speed descents, is that while my bike is vibrating and transmitting a lot of noise to my hands and arms, my butt is quiet and stable. This is true as well for similar encounters with chunky gravel. If your concern is loss of traction and control on washboard, then this isn't a solution. As far as impact on your body, the Kinekt does literally save your butt; but the rest of you will get a good shaking.
simplemind wrote:
Yes, I know it's not a suspension other than suspending your backside, and I wasn't thinking that it would have any effect on the bikes performance. What I was wondering is if you had experienced any boing-boing or pogo type reaction in a washboard situation. Just did a 66 mile race with about 40% washboard and by the time I finished EVERYTHING hurt, so I'm looking for a better solution than a solid carbon seatpost and fork. I'd like to hear from some front shock people (Lauf/Lefty/Fox) and their washboard experience...which offers the most bang for buck, seat or fork?
Thanks for the info!
Washboard is hard.
I saw an interesting video that bluntly stated that bigger tires were better than front suspension – the route was paris Roubaix and the big tires were the 650/47 WTB vs Lauf Grit. Food for thought (on cobbles at least).
I find some benefit from a suspension seat post in that it allows me to stay seated and the tire planted over washboard vs having to stand and hope my legs can absorb the washboard.
chas wrote:Washboard is hard.
I saw an interesting video that bluntly stated that bigger tires were better than front suspension – the route was paris Roubaix and the big tires were the 650/47 WTB vs Lauf Grit. Food for thought (on cobbles at least).
I find some benefit from a suspension seat post in that it allows me to stay seated and the tire planted over washboard vs having to stand and hope my legs can absorb the washboard.
chas wrote:Washboard is hard.
I saw an interesting video that bluntly stated that bigger tires were better than front suspension – the route was paris Roubaix and the big tires were the 650/47 WTB vs Lauf Grit. Food for thought (on cobbles at least).
I find some benefit from a suspension seat post in that it allows me to stay seated and the tire planted over washboard vs having to stand and hope my legs can absorb the washboard.
bobknh wrote:
Good point about staying seated with a suspension post. Not only on washboard, but when descending and climbing as well. I find that I'm more comfortable keeping weight on the saddle. which helps me maintain control - especially while cornering and keeping weight on the outside pedal.
simplemind wrote:
I need to see that video! I remember watching some slo-mo video of bodies in the Paris-Roubaix and it was wild, even with their ultra thin bodies, you could see the muscles and skin flailing with the mini impacts of the cobbles.
chas wrote:Interestingly I did a test on some harsh washboard yesterday with some 32mm tires on my Inflite with a canyon seat post
At 15-16mph the canyon carbon seat post just soaked up the harshest washboard. I didn't realize how hard I was punishing it until I put my weight forward gripped the handlebars - the front of the bike was getting the cr*p violently beat out of it. I quickly put my weight back on my saddle with a light touch on the bars.
I don't know how much was the bike and how much was the seat post, but dang, the back of this setup soaks up bumps. I do think that at speeds closer to 20mph+ that the bike would just violently skip across the tops of the crest of the washboard, but I haven't had a need to use the thudbuster since getting this bike/seatpost combination.
chas wrote:Mine came on the bike (Canyon Inflite). It is the normal looking one. Ergon sells the two bladed one Canyon uses.
I was surprised to read that they both blew away the competition (passive carbon post) in a test, and was skeptical. I had planned on taking it off the bike and using the Specialized CG-R. But after riding both, well the test was right. The Canyon/Ergon ones are a lot better.
A thudbuster (or by extension the better Kinekt Body Float) are in a different category, being active. They feel like adding an extra 1" to tire volume (or cutting tire pressure down by 50%). But, the canyon one (on the Inflite at least) does all I need.
One caveat - the flexy carbon posts need a lot of post showing to work. I put one the CG-R on a bike at the minimum insertion depth (horizontal top tube), and it didn't do squat. A thudbuster or body float is much superior in this situation.
Sign in to reply — or claim your old account if you posted here before.