Loading…
No, there is no dampening from the elastomer. Maybe it absorbs buzz, but my elastomer does not move at all.
My thoughts are to get a different seat post – but that is because I don’t like the CGR. I put it on an old school frame (horizontal top tube (steel)) and it didn’t fit, because it needs more seat post exposed than a thudbuster, although I couldn’t tell by looking at it. It also had no flex at all. I was shocked.
After several years and using it on different bikes, I’ve realized it works only because of seat post flex. Minimal seat post exposed, no flex. That V doesn’t flex at all for me (I’m 175lbs). Its all in the exposed part of the seat post. Works with a strongly sloping top tube. I’m now using it on an aluminum frame with a sloping top tuble, and it cuts down a little on the harshness and buzz of aluminum.
But I think there are better options out there. I love a thudbuster, and there are similar options. Lately I’ve been using an Ergon/Canyon VCLS (single piece, not he two bladed thing), and that is 10x better than my CGR.
Also, with the CGR, I struggle getting that thing where it won’t slip the seat angle with its single bolt attachment. What the heck. Why have something that is designed for rougher riding with a single bolt??? Similar to you, I run the seat all the way forward to try to get a reasonable setback.
And now the answer you were looking for: No, I don’t see any way it would have a problem structurally running it rotated 180 degrees.
Food for thought.
Sign in to reply — or claim your old account if you posted here before.